Campaign Finance Reform related...
Ethics In CT Government (After Impeachment Panel 2004):   How's this doing after more than a decade?
WHEREAS, public office is a public trust and the Office of the Governor is committed to restoring public confidence; and
WHEREAS, the State of  Connecticut has long been committed to establishing rules and regulations to provide safeguards to support the highest standards of public integrity and ethical principles; and
WHEREAS, transactions relating to the expenditure of public funds require the highest degree of public trust; and
WHEREAS, all public servants should seek to adhere to a high standard of ethical conduct when performing state business; and
WHEREAS, each and every public servant should strive to avoid both actual conflict of interests and any appearance of impropriety;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, M. Jodi Rell, Governor of the State of Connecticut, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and Statutes of the State, do hereby ORDER and DIRECT...Executive Order #1...

The "I didn't know" defense in action, 2018!
From the CT MIRROR, CT Access Health 
former CEO redefines the term "ACCESS"...

Jon Lender: Education Chief Admits Her Department's Failures In Nepotism Snafu
Hartford Courant
Dec. 12, 2017

In short:

“There was a use, and an abuse, and really a distortion and a corruption, of our state contracting processes in order to provide employment to the children of a director and a supervisor in our department,”

Story in full:

Voting in your employer’s interest? No conflict in Connecticut
By: Mark Pazniokas | May 24, 2017

"Perceived conflict of interest" is a term that only applies if you represent those who have ethical principles:

Comment Period On Insurance Commissioner Starts
by Christine Stuart | Jun 21, 2016 1:41pm


Story in full:

Ethics Board Will Get Second Shot At Insurance Commissioner’s Alleged Conflicts of Interest
by Christine Stuart | Jun 15, 2016 12:00am

“Is it permissible under the Code of Ethics for a registered lobbyist to become a state
employee who regulates the industry for which s/he lobbied?” Quickmire asks in her petition to the board...story in full at


Second Chance policy?

Sharkey calls for Wade’s recusal, but Malloy sees no conflict
By: Mark Pazniokas | June 10, 2016

House Speaker J. Brendan Sharkey became the first Democratic leader Friday to call on Insurance Commissioner Katharine L. Wade to recuse herself from ruling on Anthem’s merger with Bloomfield-based Cigna, the commissioner’s last private-sector employer before joining the administration of Gov. Dannel P. Malloy...story in full:

Frustration Over Campaign Settlement Lingers
by Christine Stuart | Jun 21, 2016 1:10pm

The investigation into whether the Connecticut Democratic Party properly used federal campaign funds to pay for a mailer featuring Democratic Gov. Dannel P. Malloy ended last week when the party settled with election regulators...story in full:

Democrats agree to tentative settlement in Malloy campaign case
By: Mark Pazniokas | June 15, 2016

The Connecticut Democratic Party has agreed to a tentative settlement in a case that threatened to undermine campaign finance reforms inspired by the scandal that forced Gov. John G. Rowland from office...story in full:

Another report:

`The Public Is Ready For Change'

February 3, 2005
By MARK PAZNIOKAS, Courant Staff Writer

Gov. M. Jodi Rell made a tightly scripted, highly anticipated appearance before a legislative committee Wednesday to urge passage of ethics and campaign finance reforms.

Connecticut governors rarely appear before legislative committees, but Rell's testimony was calculated to generate momentum for what she hopes will be the signal achievement of her first year as chief executive.

Rell, who became governor in July after an impeachment inquiry and federal corruption investigation forced the resignation of John G. Rowland, told lawmakers they must embrace reform in 2005.

"I can tell you the public is ready for change. The public is demanding that we give them confidence again in their state government," Rell said. "You never thought you would be responsible for that, but you truly are."

The Republican governor and the Democratic legislature agree on the broad goal of getting special-interest money out of Connecticut politics. Their approaches are different, and both sides maneuvered for advantage Wednesday.

Rell has proposed a half-dozen bills, including a ban on campaign contributions from state contractors and lobbyists, lower limits on other contributions, restrictions on political action committees, new state contracting rules and a restructured ethics commission.

Democratic legislative leaders favor the public financing of campaigns as the only sure way to limit the influence of special interests. Rell is opposed to public financing, though in remarks to reporters she signaled a willingness to compromise.

[Please read the rest of this article in the archives at the Hartford COURANT website]

Clean Up The State's Act
Published on 8/4/2004 New London DAY

On Monday, Gov. M. Jodi Rell's task force on contract reform started hearing testimony on improving the system. It wasn't lost on anyone that one of the principal speakers was state Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, a possible opponent of Gov. Rell in the 2006 election.

It's a good thing that Gov. Rell has taken the lead in reforming the system so manipulated in the administration of Gov. John G. Rowland. Gov. Rell wasn't involved in the types of decisions that led to ethical and legal violations, but as former Gov. Rowland's running mate, she can't do enough to distance herself from the nefarious practices that brought down the governor and disgraced state government. But the actions of Gov. Rell and Attorney General Blumenthal won't matter much if the Republicans and Democrats in the General Assembly don't buy into the idea.

In this venture, Gov. Rell is committed and sincere. With every action she has taken and appointments she has made, she has signaled her determination to take the sleaze out of state government.

Attorney General Blumenthal testified earlier to the legislature about ethical reforms needed to make the state more corruptionproof and he echoed many of those ideas Monday. Nevertheless, there are some strong suggestions and they bear repeating:

[Please read the rest of this article in the archives at THE DAY (New London, CT) website]

NOTE:  Mayor Malloy cleared of all wrong-doing suggestions in May 2005...

Republicans question Malloy's fund raising
By Louis Porter, ADVOCATE Staff Writer
July 20, 2004

Stamford Mayor Dannel Malloy has been traveling around the state talking to Democrats and raising money as he seeks his party's nomination for the 2006 gubernatorial election, but his campaigning has led to criticism at home.

Some city Republicans said they believe those giving to his campaign, which has raised about $830,000, may be more interested in influencing what happens in Stamford than in Hartford.

At the top of their list is Haven Healthcare Management LLC, which held a Middletown fund-raiser for Malloy on May 17. Employees of Haven Healthcare and its related companies, such as Lighthouse Medical Services, gave about $19,000 during the week of the fund-raiser.

Haven Healthcare oversees the management of Smith House, the city-owned nursing home, and is seeking a long-term contract to continue and increase its involvement in the facility.

"The message is if you want to do business with the city of Stamford, you have to come up with the cash," Republican Board of Finance member Joseph Tarzia said. "Here is a company that has a direct interest. Dollars to doughnuts they are going to get that contract."

The Haven Healthcare fund-raiser did not violate campaign finance regulations, according to the secretary of the state's office and the state Elections Enforcement Commission. There are regulations to prevent city contractors from giving to candidates for city office, but local and state laws do not address city officials seeking statewide office.

Malloy said campaign finance laws in Connecticut are strict enough to prevent corruption.

"This is a very clean process," Malloy said. "We are living by the regulations."

[Please read the rest of this article in the archives at the Stamford ADVOCATE website]

Rell Axes Commissioners; Ousts Officials Close To Controversy Or To Rowland
July 10, 2004 Hartford Courant
By CHRISTOPHER KEATING, Capitol Bureau Chief

Gov. M. Jodi Rell ousted seven top state employees Friday - all recently controversial or closely tied to former Gov. John G. Rowland.

Placing her stamp on the new administration, Rell called for a sweeping change in leadership in departments overseeing public safety, environmental protection, gambling regulation, and computer technology, among others.  Rell and her press secretary offered no explanations for accepting the resignations, but some departures had long been expected inside the state Capitol.

"I may ultimately decide that additional changes are required," Rell said. "But at this point, I have addressed the most immediate needs."  The least surprising replacement was Public Safety Commissioner Arthur Spada, whose chief of staff was arrested last week on felony fraud charges.

After meeting privately Friday with Rell, Spada pulled away from the governor's mansion in a chauffeur-driven car and told reporters that he had no major concerns.  Other highly placed Rowland appointees being replaced include:

[Please read the rest of this article in the archives at the Hartford COURANT website]


WESTON BOARD OF ETHICS FEB. 24 AT 6PM (Rescheduled) says "no conflict" - see non-LWV source for reports on this matter.
Weston Board of Ethics: Finkel has no conflict of interest
Weston FORUM
Written by Patricia Gay
Wednesday, 29 February 2012 10:47

Board of Finance member David Finkel does not have a conflict of interest, according to an advisory opinion issued by the Board of Ethics last Friday.

The issue before the board was whether Mr. Finkel, who was elected to the finance board in November, had a conflict of interest because he once had a consulting contract with the Weston school district to help reduce its overhead.

In an opinion to the Board of Selectmen dated Feb. 24, the ethics board wrote, “Since his election to the Board of Finance, Mr. Finkel has taken adequate measures to divest himself of his financial interest in the contract, and has publicly committed that he will not perform consulting services for the town of Weston while he is a member of the Board of Finance.”

The board concluded that Mr. Finkel “does not have a conflict of interest under the Code of Ethics or Section 9.1 of the Town Charter.”

Facts of the case

[Please read the rest of this article in the archives at the Weston FORUM website]